Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Mitchell 308 2000X
