Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 6000X
