Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
