Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
