Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
Seafishing
58.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics5.41 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight695g / 24.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €43.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/460
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
- Scoring 8.2 out of 10 (4.3:1), this reel offers a faster line retrieval, making it a good option for chasing pelagics or (and in practice useful for to quickly reset)
- A bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4) provides decent smoothness with moderate corrosion resistance
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX
