Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.7:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX