Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX edges out Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
