Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
