Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
