Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
60.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX
