Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX and Shimano AERO XR C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
