Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
