Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 2000X

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/240

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X
