Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/240

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
