Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/240

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and weight (245g / 8,64oz). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
