Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG
Spinning
4000mhgx
94.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/165

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X
