Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X

Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG
Spinning
4000mhgx
94.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/165

Daiwa GS LTD
Spinning
51.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.67 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €84.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX clearly outshines Daiwa GS LTD 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.49 out of 10). While Daiwa GS LTD 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG and Daiwa GS LTD?
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa GS LTD 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
