Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X

Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG
Spinning
4000mhgx
94.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/165

Delphin ELIXIR
Spinning
53.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX clearly outshines Delphin ELIXIR 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch). While Delphin ELIXIR 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG and Delphin ELIXIR?
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
