Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX

Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG
Spinning
4000mhgx
94.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/165

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX edges out Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the total score (9.49 out of 10). Still, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
