Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
90.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €226.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
