Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Shimano Ultegra

Spinning

76.80 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight180g / 6.35oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €125.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000SD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.33 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight200g / 7.05oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €655.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 180g / 6,35oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques