Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Shimano Ultegra

Spinning

76.80 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight180g / 6.35oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €125.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000SD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?

Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles