Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
