Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
