Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (180g / 6,35oz) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 8kg and a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
