Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
