Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch) and the maximum drag (40kg / 88,18lbs). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 180g / 6,35oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Shimano Tiagra?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
