Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch) and the maximum drag (40kg / 88,18lbs). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 180g / 6,35oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Shimano Tiagra?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
