Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX and Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
