Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX
