Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
