Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
