Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.1:1) and the weight (180g / 6,35oz). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
