Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
