Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
