Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
