Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX clearly outshines Shimano 19 Stella 30000X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano 19 Stella 30000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Shimano 19 Stella?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
