Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX offers a gear ratio of 6.1:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
