Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Shimano Ultegra, C3000D, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, ULTC3000D
Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €132.00
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Daiwa 22 Exist LT, 5000D-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-500
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €729.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size5000D-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Ultegra C3000DX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter / 34.25 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Ultegra C3000DX

  • Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency