Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (220g / 7,76oz). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
