Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
