Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
