Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
