Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
