Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
