Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Shimano Ultegra, C3000HGD, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, ULTC3000HGD
Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €132.00
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000HGD
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Daiwa 22 Exist LT, PC 2500D-H, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-251
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €661.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizePC 2500D-H
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX

  • Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency