Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
