Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX
