Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX
