Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX edges out Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the weight (220g / 7,76oz). Still, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 4.9:1 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
