Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.7:1) and the total score (9.03 out of 10). Still, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
